there is another serious flaw which needs to be attended.pension is based purely on number of rears for a particular rank. say a jco having length of 26 yrs will get the same pension whether one has served in particular rank for 5 years or one year,
there is another serious flaw which needs to be attended.pension is based purely on number of rears for a particular rank. say a jco having length of 26 yrs will get the same pension whether one has served in particular rank for 5 years or one year,
Jco totally ignored...A Naib Subedar on completing 17 Yrs in Y gp is getting only Rs 8740 and a Havldar of X group is getting 8925 much more than a Havaldar. Is it OROP. Totally unjustified..where as officers are given increase of almost equivalent to JCO pension.
Well, some officers like me have also not benefitted much. With 37 years of service having retired in 2009 with Rs 38380 as pension will be entitled to revised pension of only Rs 38760.
Court only the place can do some thing for JCO,'s
ReplyDeleteCourt only the place can do some thing for JCO,'s
ReplyDeletethere is another serious flaw which needs to be attended.pension is based purely on number of rears for a particular rank. say a jco having length of 26 yrs will get the same pension whether one has served in particular rank for 5 years or one year,
ReplyDeletethere is another serious flaw which needs to be attended.pension is based purely on number of rears for a particular rank. say a jco having length of 26 yrs will get the same pension whether one has served in particular rank for 5 years or one year,
ReplyDeleteJco totally ignored...A Naib Subedar on completing 17 Yrs in Y gp is getting only Rs 8740 and a Havldar of X group is getting 8925 much more than a Havaldar. Is it OROP. Totally unjustified..where as officers are given increase of almost equivalent to JCO pension.
ReplyDeleteWell, some officers like me have also not benefitted much. With 37 years of service having retired in 2009 with Rs 38380 as pension will be entitled to revised pension of only Rs 38760.
ReplyDelete